in a world of perfectly equal possibilities we are all perfectly equal possibilities, perfectly equal to chose or to not chose, to be chosen or not chosen
in this world the choice of x over y is no more than the choice of y over z or of x over z
the combinations are as many as there are living bodies or living personalities within these bodies
so the only difference in choosing one over the other resides in that that one isn’t the other just as the other isn’t the other one
so the sum of differences would be equal to 0 in such a way that choosing becomes more a matter of personal preference and availability or approachability
and whom ever tries to disprove this simple observation usually finds himself in front of a stone wall that cant be nor broken into nor over-passed
a conational of mine named it the not to be explained mystery
he considered it would rip some of life s potentiality
but
as scientists
we are doomed to equations and solutions
where X Y AND Z in any constellation must provide valid results
therefore the choice belongs to the white monkey that perceives the rise from the four legged condition as illumination
only to welcome its automatisms and natural delays in thinking as biped foundations
and so we must ask on which criteria precisely would or could be judged
what is, what is not and the forever what if, could it
unfortunately, WE are too often mesmerized by delusions of one type or another to see clearly what comes from underneath
it is plain
as you wonder your choice, some of your choices already belong to someone else
more even, some of your choices aren’t even your own because they are entitled to choices of their own and this is what they usually call free will
perfectly free by the perfectly equal nature of choice
another point in this discussion would be that of the demand
when all equals all and the importance goes as far as the chooser allows it to go
then how do you explain to the tiny being that perceives oneself as unique that they all are
and that onenesses nullify each other
we must be unique, necessary, interesting and without a doubt unlivable without
how did this story begin
from the filling of empty time
it happens in short moments of empty time that we question what the others are thinking
and a deeply I-sh part of us would like them to think about us, to be the central element of their existence, the cornerstone, the one and the only one
while there are so many
why one and not the other
‘tis one question we have been asking since the beginning of time
instead of perhaps turning the point against itself and asking why not
some crave for answer and validation of the one and only story, narcissism if you may or the profound doubt that if not x than y
then the cynicism
but we survived so for so long
until the choice shifted indeed from one to x z or another
or is it one now
some don’t admit usually what some don’t understand
what hasn’t quantity and cannot be touched with the hands or eyes
and the need for proof
but in which form and how much in order to accept the choice
or just plain straightforwardness which would be even odder because we are not accustomed to it .
man be thy name and doubting be thy stone
even in the mischievous form of a woman
